Christiane Seydou ne cache pas son admiration et son enthousiasme pour le poème de Ramatullahi. Elle s’en saisit et en fait une belle et savante exégèse. Dans l’introduction elle écrit :
« … ce poème, d’inspiration religieuse et mystique, est un de ces waajooji traditionnels qui traitent généralement de sujets élevés, et, le plus souvent, métaphysiques 3. Celui-ci n’est autre qu’un extraordinaire « sermon sur la mort » versifié avec une virtuosité que jamais n’entache aucune acrobatie verbale déplacée, et une puissance d’évocation et d’invocation à laquelle, comme envoûtée, l’imagination ne peut se dérober. »
« La richesse de ce texte est telle, à tous points de vue, qu’il a semblé profitable d’en étudier très attentivement toutes les ressources et les dimensions, par une sorte d’exégèse scrupuleuse du fond lui-même tout autant que par l’analyse serrée des procédés poétiques qui en font une réussite artistique incontestable et une oeuvre littéraire d’une grande portée. »
En conclusion, Christiane Seydou avoue :
« Il est impossible, face à ce poème, de ne pas évoquer ce passage, extrait de Les Tragiques d’Agrippa d’Aubigné — écrivain, poète, politicien, et militaire protestant du 16è siècle —, dont l’inspiration, les images, la technique poétique même se trouvent si étonnamment proches de celles de Ramatullaahi Telikoo… »
C’est là un grand hommage, car l’oeuvre d’Agrippa occupe une place importante dans la littérature française. Par exemple, d’Aubigné compte le titan littéraire Victor Hugo parmi ses distants admirateurs.…
Je propose ici ma lecture du poème en six enregistrements sonores. Chacun d’eux comporte huit strophes de trois vers ou tercets, pour un total de 192 vers. Des versions du texte complet sont accessibles, l’une dans La Femme. La Vache. La Foi (A.I.Sow, éd., non commentée), l’autre (avec la présentation et les commentaires détaillés de Christiane Seydou) sur Persée et sur SemanticAfrica.
Gimol Aranol – A. Strophes 1 à 8
Gimol Dimmol – B. Strophes 9 à 19
Gimol Tammol – C. Strophes 20 à 30
Gimol Nayaɓol – D. Strophes 31 à 41
Gimol Jowaɓol – E. Strophes 42 à 52
Gimol Jeegaɓol – F. Strophes 53 à 64 Yimoore : Ramatullahi Diallo, Telikoo (1870?-1930?) Yimoowo: Tierno Siradiou Bah, Kompanya
Sunni, érudite et suufi, Ramatullahi s’affirme comme l’une des grandes plumes et voix du Pular littéraire. Maîtrisant l’arabe classique, elle emploie cette langue pour présenter Majaaɗo Allah Gaynaali. Elle y décline son identité futanienne, ainsi que ses créances et affiliations islamiques. Elle commence naturellement par la formule tasmiyya, qui ouvre toutes les surates ou chapîtres du Qur’an :
Bismiil’Aahi ‘rrahmaani ‘rrahiimi
Cette formule initiale est aussi fréquente que la Shahada, le premier des cinq piliers de l’Islam. La norme UNICODE parvient à condenser toute la formule — représentée ci-dessous en ligature arabe — à l’aide des huit caractères suivants : ﷽
La version Pular/Fulfulde est :
En barkinorii Innde Allaahu, Jom Moƴƴere Huuɓunde, Jom Moƴƴere Heerinnde
Ensuite Ramatullahi prononce les bénédictions conventionnelles pour le Prophète Muhammad, sa Famille et ses Compagnons :
wa sallal ‘Allahu ‘alaa sayyidinaa Muhammadin wa ‘alaa ‘aalihi wa sahabihi wa sallama.
En Pular/Fulfulde :
Yo Allaahu juulu e Kohoo meeɗen Muhammadu e Aalii’en makko e Sahaabaaɓe makko O hisna ɓe hisnude.
En quatrième position vient le tahmid : “al hamdu lil’Aahi” (Allah soit Loué) — en Pular/Fulfulde Allahu jaarama, qui continue l’ouverture.
En cinquième position, on lit trois dernières phrases qui sont une variante de louanges à Allah et de prières à l’intention du Prophète de l’Islam :
wa assalaatu wa assallaamu ‘alaa rasuuli Allahi wa ‘alaa aalihi wa jamii’i hizbu Allahi. wa ba’du, fa yaquulu ahwaju, waju ‘ibaadi Allahi
Noble et pieuse Ramatullahi
Les sept lignes finales de la préface en arabe révèlent la noble extraction et la pieuse personnalité de Ramatullahi. Elle y indique sa généalogie partielle, son village, son pays, et ses affiliations religieuses :
De la part de Ramatullahi, fille de Muhammadu, fils d’Ahmadu Mahdiyyu De Telikoo Du Fuuta-Jalon De l’Occident De Voie Malékite De Loi Ash’ari De Rite Qadri
En d’autres termes, Ramatullahi descend de Muhammadu, fils d’Ahmadu Mahdiyyu. Elle est de Telikoo, une misiide (paroisse) — du Diiwal (province) de Buriya —, dans le Fuuta-Jalon théocratique, pays situé à l’ouest de La Mecque. Elle est adepte de la Voie de l’Imam Malik et de la Loi Ash’ari. Enfin, elle appartient au rite Qadiriyya.
A suivre : Misiide Telikoo, Diiwal Buriyaa, Gilbert Viellard
Je propose ici une lecture critique de l’article “Révolte, pouvoir, religion : les Hubbu du Fuuta-Jalon” par l’anthropologue et historien Roger Botte. Relativement fouillé et long, le document est le fruit de recherches d’un membre du Groupe d’Études comparatives des sociétés peules (GREFUL). Créé et animé depuis les années 1990, ce cercle groupe d’éminents chercheurs français. Roger Botte, Jean Boutrais et Jean Schmitz pilotent le GREFUL. Ensemble, ils supervisèrent la publication de Figures peules (1999). Cet ouvrage de 534 pages est remarquable par la diversité des contributions qui le composent. On peut visiter webPulaaku pour la bio-bibliographie des auteurs sus-nommés.
A l’instar d’initiatives similaires, le GREFUL fait un apport considérable aux études et à la connaissance du monde Fulɓe. Je leur tire ici mon chapeau cônique de bouvier-vacher Pullo en signe de reconnaissance et d’hommage !
En matière recherche le consensus — basé sur l’évidence des faits et l’adéquation de l’argumentation — est plus fréquent, voire plus important, que l’unanimité. Et les sciences sociales sont soumises aux mêmes lois et règles de logique que leurs jumelles formelles et expérimentales. Victor Hugo formule éloquemment les astreintes et contraintes de la recherche scientifique lorsqu’il écrit : « La science est l’asymptote de la vérité. Elle approche sans cesse, et ne touche jamais. » La republication sur webPulaaku des travaux collectifs et individuels de l’équipe du GREFUL et de milliers d’autres sources (livres, périodiques, photos) épouse cette dynamique. Elle vise à enrichir la recherche, les connaissances culturelles, et l’éducation. Souscrivant à l’aphorisme de Hugo ci-dessus, l’objectif est de reconstruire sur le Web, autant que possible, la profonde et vaste expérience du monde fulɓe, alias “archipel peul”. Le contenu du site réflète différentes hypothèses, methodologies, théories, travaux de terrain, et opinions. Ces tensions sont inévitables. On les retrouve présentes dans l’article de Roger Botte. J’en esquisse ici une lecture critique et constructive, certes. Mais là où c’est requis, ma démarche va aussi droit au but ; elle appelle les choses par leur nom en signalant les failles et les erreurs du document. Ce faisant, mon propos est de contribuer à la réflexion mûrie et à la communication positive. En définitive, surmontant les divergences inhérentes à la profession, espérons que la coopération permettra d’impulser les études fulɓe dans la voie de la recherche et de la publication Mes remarques se rangent dans trois catégories :
Le contexte de préparation de l’article, la méthodologie et les sources citées par l’auteur
Le contexte de l’article, la méthodologie et les sources citées par l’auteur
Racines lointaines et contexte récent
Aucune indication n’est fournie sur les recherches et les ressources mises en oeuvre dans la préparation de l’article, notamment l’étendue du travail sur le terrain en Guinée. Il faut cependant de relever la date de publication, 1988, qui se situe dans la période postérieure à la mort du président Sékou et au renversement de son régime par l’armée le 3 avril 1984.
La dictature “révolutionaire” étrangla la recherche scientifique. Elle déclara son chef omniscient, et proclama l’idéologie —versatile et à géométrie variable— du PDG comme le summum de la connaissance. La présence des chercheurs africains et étrangers fut découragée. Une autarcie intellectuelle débilitante s’installa. Elle plongea l’université et la recherche professionnelle et civile dans la sclérose et la médiocrité. Et Roger Botte n’aurait pas été autorisé à travailler sur le terrain. J’en sais un peu en tant que professeur et co-rédacteur en chef — avec mon collègue et ami Bailo Teliwel Diallo — de Miriya, revue des sciences économiques et sociales de l’Université guinéenne, de 1975 à 1982, année de mon départ pour l’Université du Texas à Austin en tant que Fulbright-Hayes Senior Scholar. Malgré les obstacles matériels et financiers, l’édition universitaire réapparut péniblement en Guinée à travers cet organe. En effet Miriya était médiocrement appuyé par les autorités, et sa parution dépendait d’un équippement vétuste, cadeau de l’Allemagne de l’Est. Auparavant, de 1959-1965, la revue Recherches Africaines reprit le flambeau de la publication scientifique. Elle fut, elle-même, le prolongement d’Etudes Guinéennes (1947-1955), lancée par Georges Balandier dans le cadre du programme du Centre-IFAN de Guinée.
Balandier commença donc sa carrière en Guinée, où il connut et appuya intellectuellement la percée de Sékou Touré. Afrique ambiguë, son livre-référence, inclut la Guinée, en général, et le Fuuta-Jalon, en particulier. Après 1958, il poursuivit ses recherches ailleurs sur le continent, avant de rentrer à Paris, où il émergea comme l’une figure de proue de l’Université française. Face à la politique répressive du leader, il devint, jusqu’à sa mort, un critique irréductible du régime guinéen.
Recherches Africaines bénéficia de l’apport d’éminents administrateurs, chercheurs et auteurs : Tierno Chaikou Baldé, Laye Camara, Ousmane Poreko Diallo, Mamadou Traoré Ray Autra, Jean Suret-Canale, Djibril Tamsir Niane, Nenekhaly Condetto Camara, etc. Ce succès suscita la jalousie de Sékou Touré, qui condamna la revue à l’asphyxie et à une mort silencieuse en 1965. Cinquante-deux plus tard, en cette année 2017, et Camp Boiro oblige, la recherche scientifique ne s’est pas remise de cette politique obscurantiste et destructrice. En 1984 le régime militaire du CMRN ouvrit les portes de Boiro et de la Guinée aux contacts et aux visites des voisins et des étrangers. La chute du PDG intervint huit ans après le « complot peul », du nom de la conspiration montée contre les Fulɓe par Sékou Touré en 1976-77.
L’affaire souffla un vent hostile et meurtrier sur le Fuuta-Jalon. Telli Diallo, Dr. Alpha Oumar Barry, Alioune Dramé (Sarakolé haalpular), et des dizaines de co-accusés périrent dans le Goulag guinéen. Pour asseoir le mensonge, Sékou Touré prononça trois discours incendiaires sur l’histoire du Fuuta, l’implantation difficile du PDG, la malhonnêteté, le manque d’intégrité, bref la moralité douteuse des habitants de la région, etc. Il fit des allégations, parfois rocambolesques, destinées à minimiser le rôle historique des Fulɓe sur leur propre sol ancestral. A contre-coeur, il concéda toutefois : « C’est l’intelligence, c’est la culture. Et les Peulhs avaient de leur côté, un stock culturel plus avancé. » Trop tard, car il avait répandu le venin de la suspiscion, et semé les graines de la division. Le pays frôla la haine inter-communautaire et les affrontements inter-ethniques armés. Exactement comme le PDG enflamma les relations entre Fulɓe et Sose dans sa marche forcée et ensanglantée vers le pouvoir.
Ancien officier et l’un des hommes des sales besognes de Sékou Touré, Général Lansana Conté utilisa la même stratégie de la violence afin de diviser pour régner. Deux de ces incitations sont consignées dans les annales douloureuses de l’histoire guinéenne : en 1985 avec son fameux “Wo fatara” (vous avez bien fait) lancé aux gones et aux loubards qui pillaient les propriétés maninka à Conakry, et en 1991 lorsque Conté poussa les Forestiers à massacrer des centaines de Maninka à Nzérékoré et ailleurs.
A partir de 1978 donc, on note le début de la révision de l’histoire de l’Etat théocratique du Fuuta-Jalon aux fins de réduire l’importance de l’hégémonie fulɓe. Ce révisonnisme fantaisiste se manifesta durant l’élection présidentielle de 2010. Il prit d’abord la forme de pogroms anti-fulɓe en Haute-Guinée ainsi que de campagnes d’intimidation par des donso (confrérie de chasseurs maninka). Ces renégats violaient ouvertement l’antique code d’honneur de l’association. Ils n’étaient que des mercenaires aux ordres d’Alpha Condé et d’extrémistes de son parti, le RPG. Ensuite, au seuil de la présidentielle de 2015, le politicien et député Mansour Kaba — aujourd’hui relégué aux oubliettes — se démena comme un beau diable au nom d’un Manden-Jalon hypothétique et illusoire. Fruit de l’ignorance, figment d’une imagination sevrée de l’Histoire, ces divagations parlaient de noyauter et d’occulter la tradition de tolérance et la riche expérience de la nation pré-coloniale Fuutanke ; une communauté bâtie par l’Etat théocentrique islamique supra-ethnique ; une société pluri-éthnique “structurée et disciplinée” (Telli Diallo 1957), incluant Fulɓe, Toroɓɓe, Jalonke, Sarakole, Jakanke, Sose, Maninka, Tyapi, Landuma, Nalu, Koniagui, Bassari, Badiaranke, Serer, Wolof, Bamana, etc.
C’est le lieu d’honorer la mémoire de Sori Kandia Kouyaté, l’un des plus illustres Jeli du 20è siècle, fils de Ditinn (Dalaba), et porteur émérite des cultures fulɓe et mande.
Hellaya. Sori Kandia Kouyaté chante en pular, son autre langue maternelle. Il est accompagné par l’orchestre Kélétigui Traoré et ses Tambourini.
Enfin, l’article de Roger Botte se fait un peu l’écho d’agitations idéologiques et politiciennes récentes et lointaines, ainsi que de la manipulation de l’histoire contre le Fuuta-Jalon. Le papier inclut ainsi des passages qui ne résistent pas à l’étude approfondie et à l’analyse professionnelle du passé. Roger Botte reprend, par exemple, la notion d’une certaine parité numérique Fulɓe-Mande parmi les fondateurs de la théocratie. Mais la liste qu’il en donne est plutôt vague et peu convaincante.
Un correspondant a publié sur mon Facebook Wall l’information suivante datant du 17 avril 2009 et intitulée “Un village fulani en Algérie” :
« A Fulani village in Algeria Anyone acquainted with West African history will be aware of the remarkable extent of the Fulani diaspora, stretching from their original homeland in Senegal all the way to Sudan. However, I was surprised to read the following note in a history of the Tidikelt region of southern Algeria (around In-Salah): “Le village actuel de Sahel a été créé en 1779 par Sidi Abd el Malek des Foullanes, venu à Akabli dans l’intention de se joindre à une pèlerinage, dont le départ n’eut pas lieu… Les Foullanes sont des Arabes originaires du Macena (Soudan); il y a encore des Foullanes au Sokoto; Si Hamza, le cadi d’Akabli appartient à cette tribu.” (L. Voinot, Le Tidikelt, Oran, Fouque 1909, p. 63) The current village of Sahel was created in 1779 by Sidi Abd el Malek of the Fulani, who had come to Akabli with the intention of joining a pilgrimage whose departure never occurred… The Fulani are Arabs originating from Macina (Sudan, modern-day Mali); there are still Fulani at Sokoto; Si Hamza, the qaid of Akabli, belongs to this tribe.) I very much doubt there would be any traces of the language left (in Algeria) — even assuming that Sidi Abd el Malek came with a large enough entourage to make a difference — but wouldn’t it be interesting to check? » Lameen Souag
Traduction des passages anglais ci-dessus:
Toute personne connaissant l’histoire de l’Afrique de l’Ouest est consciente de l’étendue remarquable de la diaspora Fulani, s’étendant de leur foyer originel au Sénégal jusqu’au Soudan (Khartoum). Cependant, j’étais surpris de lire la note suivante au sujet de l’histoire de la région de Tidikelt, au sud de l’Algérie (aux environs d’In-Salah).…… Le village actuel de Sahel fut fondé en 1779 par Sidi Abd el Malek, des Fulani, qui était venu à Akabli avec l’intention de se joindre au pèlerinage et dont le départ n’eut jamais lieu … Les Fulani sont des Arabes originaires du Macina (Sudan, actuel Mali); il y a des Fulani au Sokoto; Si Hamza, le chef d’Akabli, appartient à cette tribu. Je doute fort qu’il reste des traces de la langue (en Algerie) — même si l’on suppose que Sidi Abd el Malek vint avec un entourage large assez pour faire la différence — mais ne serait-il pas intéressant de vérifier ?
J’ai répondu sur Facebook en quelques points, que je reprends ici avec un peu plus de détails.
Les fondateurs du village étaient en transit pour le pèlerinage à La Mecque. Pourquoi sont-ils restés sur place sans poursuivre leur randonnée ? Combien étaient-ils ?
Rappel : le nom propre pluriel est Fulɓe ; au singulier Pullo. Leur nom varie cependant selon leurs contacts : Français et Maghrébins les appellent Foulanes, chez les Hausa ils deviennent des Fulani, pour les Wolof/Serères ces sont des Peuls, les Mande les désignent par Fula, les Sose en font des Fulè, etc.
L’évolution historique, culturelle et politique des Fulɓe, couvre toute la gamme des formes d’organisation sociale: Tribu, Ethnie, Supra-ethnie, Nation et Civilisation. Mais, comme tous les peuples africains, ils n’ont pas fait — de façon autonome — l’expérience (positive et négative) de la révolution industrielle, à partir du 18è siècle. Avec ses prolongements dans la révolution numérique. Les conséquences de cette lacune historique sont connus : colonisation, domination, dépendance, sous-développement.
La question de l’origine d’un peuple nomade aussi les Fulɓe est aussi vieille qu’on puisse remonter les sources écrites sur l’Afrique. Par les Arabes, d’abord, et ensuite par les Européens. Aujourd’hui, toutefois, il faut retenir que les racines et les ramifications des Fulɓe sont aussi africaines que celles de tout autre population autochtone du continent. Ils ne sont venus ni d’Orient (Proche, Moyen ou Extrême) ni même de l’Egypte proche de leur foyer probable de diffusion, c’est-à-dire l’antique Sahara.
Rejettant les théories et les spéculations parfois absurdes, l’archéologie repère la présence des Fulɓe dans la région de Tassili n’Ajer (sud de l’Algérie) depuis au moins 5000 ans av-J.C. Consulter, par exemple, les travaux de Henri Lhote, par exemple, son article “L’extraordinaire aventure des Peuls”. Lhote fut l’un des premiers archéologues à explorer en détail les peintures rupestres des caves du Tassili. Entre autres impressions, il releva la forte ressemblance entre les figures dépeintes et la physionomie des Fulɓe contemporains. En 1962, Germaine Dieterlen (sa co-auteure de la version française de Kumen) invita son collègue Amadou Hampâté Bâ —qui était alors ambassadeur du Mali à l’UNESCO — à visiter l’exposition de Henri Lhote au musée de l’Homme à Paris. A la vue des images présentés, Hampâté s’exclama : “Mes ancêtres sont passés par là !” Et d’ajouter : “Mon peuple est extrêmement ancien.”
L’Afrique est le berceau de l’humanité. C’est d’elle, et précisément dans l’actuel Sahara, que les précurseurs des Fulɓe se constituèrent dans la nuit des temps. Le Sahara était alors une région arrosée, fertile et abondante en vertes prairies, favorables à l’élevage et au nomadisme.…
Au plan des sciences biologiques la recherche conjointe — génétique et génomique — du 21e siècle a établi le tour de force qu’est le séquençage de la vache. Les scientifiques concluent que ce mammifère subit une mutation génétique majeure. En vertu de cette évolution, elle devint capable de consommer de la nourriture de faible qualité (herbe, feuilles, écorces) et de les transformer en produits riches en protéines (lait, viande), indispensables à la vie. Il fallut six ans d’efforts et une équipe de 25 chercheurs pour réaliser le séquençage. Boubacar Diallo, ingénieur d’élevage en Guinée, fut associé aux travaux. Non pas parce que son pays soit doté d’une infrastructure moderne de recherche, mais surtout pour son appartenance à une ethnie associée avec, et spécialiste traditionnelle du bovidé. Lire “The Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution.” De son côté, la base de données du laboratoire Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System (Dagris) contient la liste de quelque 120 groupes, sous-groupes et hybrides de l’espèce bovine en Afrique. Le cinquième de ce catalogue se réfère, directement ou indirectement, au domaine Fulɓe, avec des noms de bétail tels que N’Dama, Fulani, Gambian Longhorn, Red Fulani, White Fulani, Fellata, Sokoto, Yola, Gudali, M’Bororo, Adamawa, Red Bororo, Fulani Sudanese, etc.
Il y a environ 10.000 ans des communautés humaines domestiquèrent le bovin (vache, taureau) et en fait un partenaire inséparable. Les Proto-Fulbe prirent part à cette invention, qui propulsa l’entrée de l’humanité dans la civilisation.
Il a été également prouvé que l’espèce bovine d’Afrique et celle d’Asie se sont génétiquement différenciées il y a de 22,000 ans. Chaque d’elle acquit depuis des traits spécifiques. La leçon à tirer est claire : Tout comme les premiers Fulbe, le bovidé du continent est entièrement africain. Il n’est venu de l’Asie ni de l’Europe. Lire “Cattle Before Crops: The Beginnings of Food Production in Africa” sur Semantic Africa.
Le même document souligne que contrairement à l’évolution constatée sur d’autres continents, l’Afrique inventa l’élevage avant l’agriculture. D’où le titre “Bétail avant Cultures” (Cattle Before Crops) du rapport technique.
J’ai tenté de dégager (en anglais sur Semantic Africa) la convergence entre la cosmogonie millénaire des Fulɓe et la science de pointe du 21è siècle. Wikipédia me vient en renfort en indiquant que la complexion génétique de l’être humain et celle de la vache sont à 80 pour cent identiques. Est-il surprenant, dès lors, que ce mammifère occupe, depuis plus de 10 siècles, une place centrale dans l’expérience humaine. Les Egyptiens, les Juifs, les Hindous, etc. ont, hier et/ou aujourd’hui, rejoignent les Fulbe dans la perpétuation d’une compagnie que certains considèrent symbiotique.
Voir également le diagramme conceptuel qui donne une visualisation condensée de l’exploration complexe des Fulɓe, qui incluent plusieurs autres populations.
J’introduis ici l’article “Les armées peul de l’Adamawa au 19e siècle” du Professeur Thierno Mouctar Bah, paru dans Etudes africaines : offertes à Henri Brunschwig, (EHESS, Paris, 1982). Conformément à ma ligne éditoriale, je convertis les noms francisés en version autochtone. D’où “Les armées fulɓe de l’Adamawa”. Une telle démarche supprime l’ambiguité inhérente aux noms étrangers, qui utilise le même terme (Fula, Fulani, Peul, etc.) pour désigner le peuple et la langue. Par contraste, le vocabulaire autochtone distingue nettement entre les noms désignant les locuteurs/locutrices (Pullo, singulier, et Fulɓe, pluriel), d’une part, et ceux indiquant la langue : Pular/Pulaar (à l’ouest de la Boucle du Niger) et Fulfulde (à l’est de celle-ci). De même je transcris les noms de personne et de lieu selon l’Alphabet Standard (Bamako, 1966).
Ma parenté avec Thierno Mouctar Bah
Thierno Mouctar est doublement mon parent ; cousin et neveu du côté de ma mère, cousin de côté de mon père. Son père, feu Elhadj Bailo Bah, est le cousin de ma mère. Soeur cadette de Saifoulaye Diallo, feue Hadja Safiatou, est une nièce de ma mère, mais aussi également la belle-soeur de mon père. Notre auteur porte le nom du frère benjamin de Tierno Aliyyu Buuɓa-Ndiyan. Notre dernière rencontre remonte à 2004 à Conakry. Je lui présentai mes condoléances à la suite du décès de Salimatou, sa soeur cadette et ma promotionnaire au Collège court de Labé aujourd’hui Lycée Cindel, au sud-est de la ville.
Un document innovateur et substantiel
Revenant à l’article, je vourais rappeler le parcours personnel et la carrière académique brillante de ce Fuutanke devenu fils adoptif et chercheur chveronné sur l’Adamawa —si distant de son Fuuta-Jalon natal. L’apport de Thierno Mouctar est singulier sur au moins deux points.
Une recherche est soignée et détailée; un compte-rendu direct, dépouillé et instructif. Le document est innovateur et substantiel.
L’article donne corps et vie à l’étude de Jean Suret-Canale intitulée “Essai sur la signification sociale et historique des hégémonies Peules (17e-18e-19e siècles)” (Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Marxistes + Recherches Africaines). Au lieu de se camper au niveau de la chronologie et des considérations générales, Thierno Mouctar nous enseigne beaucoup et mieux, en particulier sur le rôle prééminent du Arɗo (plur. Arɓe). Ce personnage antique, et pour ainsi parler ubiquitaire, fut rééllement pan-fulɓe. Il actualisa et symbolisa des siècles exaltants de l’histoire et de la civilisation pastorale fulɓe. Il incarne les valeurs guerrières, chevaleresques et héroiques fulbe. Sur les traces des grands bardes qui les ont précédés —je pense à Ali Farka Touré — Baaba, Mansour Seck et Daande Lenyol, célebrent l’épopée de Samba Gelaajo Jeejo, le preux Arɗo. Aux louanges des artistes s’ajoutent les nombreux ouvrages consacrés aux Arɓe. Voir la section qui leur est dédiée sur webPulaaku. avec un lien sur les Contes et légendes des Fulakunda du Bajar. Le cycle de Gelaajo, fils de Ham-Boɗeejo. Indiquons également l’ouvrage de Christiane Seydou sur Tinguidji, maître de la parole, etc..… Le leadership du Arɗo prédate de loin l’islamisation. Il atteignit vraisemblablement son apogée avec la dynastie des Koliyaaɓe à l’Ouest (Sénégal, Gambie, Guinée-Bissau, Guinée, Mali). Le règne des Arɓe déclina graduellement avant d’être assimilé par l’avènement du clergé musulman, d’abord au Fuuta-Jalon (avec les Almaami), ensuite au Fuuta-Tooro (avec les Toroɓɓe) et au Maasina (avec Sheku Ahmadu Bari). Dans chacun des ces états la titulature arabo-musulmane supplanta celle des Arɓe. Aujourd’hui, les Arɓe musulmans persistèrent dans l’Est, notamment en Adamawa.…
Ali Farka Touré et Toumany Diabaté. Samba Gelaajo
Baaba Maal e Daande Lenyol. Samba Gelaajo Jeegi
Points de débats et contestations
Je relève deux points sujets à débats et contestations. Ils reflètent en réalité l’environnement intellectuel des recherches en sciences sociales en Afrique, à l’aube des indépendances dans les années 1960-70. En effet la note numéro 35 en fin d’article contient deux points qui suscitent les débats et alimentent les contestations. On y lit :
« Ce fut le cas en particulier de Samory qui, au 19e siècle, a su faire imiter à la perfection par ses forgerons les fusils à tir rapide que les puissances impérialistes refusaient de lui vendre. »
Ce passage insert, à juste titre, le personnage de l’Empereur Samori Touré dans un article sur l’art martial des Fulɓe. Mais il fait écho, à mon avis, à l’environnement intellectuel des recherches en sciences sociales en Afrique, à l’aube des indépendances dans les années 1960-70. On retrouve un style pareil sous la plume des historiens aînés de Thierno Mouctar, par exemple, Joseph Ki-Zerbo dans son Histoire de l’Afrique Noire. D’hier à Demain , et Djibril Tamsir Niane dans UNESCO — General History of Africa, Volume IV, Africa from the Twelfth to the Sixteenth Century. C’était, on le sait, le temps de l’euphorie et des espoirs inspirés par la souveraineté bourgeonnante des Etats africains naguère colonisés. Malheureusement, cette époque est révolue. Et l’histoire a détourné le continent de chemins exaltants… Surtout en Guinée et sa dictature pérenne !
Mes objections sont donc les suivantes :
1. Les impérialistes occidentaux ne tenaient évidemment pas à vendre des armes à des chefs et rois qu’ils combattaient ou envisageaient de combattre. Car ces armes et munitions auraient pu être retournées contre eux. Il est vrai que marchands d’armes, négociants et trafiquants passaient souvent outre les consignes des stratèges (civils et militaires) de la ruée de l’Europe sur l’Afrique. 2. Il a été question de l’ingéniosité et de la capacité de l’armée de Samori à “imiter à la perfection par ses forgerons les fusils à tir rapide”. Mais cet argument prête un flanc faible à la critique. Car l’imitation ne s’appliquait pas aux armes lourdes de l’artillerie (canons, mitrailleuses, cannonières, etc.) A la fin du 19e siècle, Europe occidentale avait presque bouclé la Révolution Industrielle. D’une importance sans précéden dans l’histoire de l’humanité, ce processus lui donnait un avantage —économique, technlogique et militaire — énorme sur le reste du monde. Ainsi, sur les champs de bataille d’Afrique, Samori en subit le choc démoralisateur. De 1887-1888 il livra le Sikaso-Kèlè à Babemba, roi de ce pays. Face à la résistance et aux tatas fortifiés de la cité, Samori dut lever son siège, non sans y avoir perdu ses meilleurs généraux, dont son frère, Kèmè Bourema, chef de la cavalerie, Lankama N’Valy Kamara, le vainqeur de Houbbous du Fuuta-Jalon, etc. Lorsqu’il apprit plus tard l’assaut français et la chute de Sikasso devant l’artillerie étrangère, il s’écria, résigné : Bori banna ! (Finie l’évasion, la fuite). C’est-à-dire ses dérobades vers l’est, en Côte d’Ivoire, face aux gains militaires français. En conclusion, il est surfait de comparer le perfectionnement et la productivité des usines d’armes européennes avec les imitations des ateliers artisanaux de Samori.
Nonobstant ces deux remarques, les travaux et la contribution du Pr. Thierno Mouctar sont mondialement reconnus. Son article sur les armées fulɓe de l’Adamawa au 19e siècle restera un morceau classique d’investigation et de découverte du passé africain.
Dianne White Oyler’s article on the N’ko Alphabet includes my contextual annotations and corrections. The paper appeared in 2001, four years before the same author’s book named The History of the N’ko Alphabet and Its Role in Mande Transnational Identity. Words as Weapons. I focus here on the article below, which Dianne wrote based on her fieldwork in Conakry and Kankan, back in 1994. As the saying goes one is entitled to one’s opinion but not to one’s facts, lest they are the “alternative facts” per Ms. Kellyanne Conway now infamous TV statement. In this case, it is normal and routine to study and even support cultural activism and language revival efforts around the world. However, does such an activity and commitment permit to publish fabricated facts or falsifications of the historical record? I don’t think so. Dianne correctly points out that “Sékou Touré’s archival documents, including personal papers and correspondence, were either destroyed or hidden after his death. Consequently, there are no currently existing archives of the First Republic and the papers that are hidden are inaccessible.” However, it is counterproductive to try to fill in that void with superficial documents and inaccurate information. Such a shortcut circumvents academic deontology. Worse, it ends up hurting the cause championed, here the N’ko Alphabet. And it lowers considerably the quality and the value of the output. That explains —but does not justify— why Dianne’s article “A cultural revolution in Africa: literacy in the Republic of Guinea since independence” is replete with errors and exaggerations. Again, I react contextually below on those shortcomings. That said, and for the record, my track record in the Guinea national language debate dates back to the mid-1970s. I was then a young faculty in the Linguistics and African Languages department of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences. I also headed the Pular section of the Academy of National Languages, in close collaboration with a competent and elder deputy in the person of the late Mamadou Gangue (a survivor of the “Teachers Plot”). The work environment was quite collegial, and I was great professional rapport with the head of the Sosokui section, the late Kanfory Bangoura. In 1975 I wrote a lengthy descriptive and analytical paper titled “La politique linguistique du Parti démocratique de Guinée,” in Miriya, Revue des Sciences économiques et sociales, of which I was co-publisher with Bailo Teliwel Diallo. My article generated positive verbal comments from my colleagues, Yolande Joseph-Nöelle, for example, and from her husband, Senainon Béhanzin, the de facto intellectual guru of Sékou Touré During the 2010 presidential election campaign, relying heavily on the Maninka electorate of Haute-Guinée, the RPG candidate, Alpha Condé, vowed his support for the ongoing N’ko campaign. He subsequently “won” the second round. But his regime did little to translate the promises into funded programs. Having managed to gain a second term in 2015, Mr. Condé does not give cultural activities the priority they deserve. His former deputy, the late Ahmed Tidiane Cissé, lamented the lack of governmental support for his ministry of culture.… In sum, N’ko has not fared well under any of the three Maninka presidents of Guinea: Sékou Touré, Sékouba Konaté and Alpha Condé. Ditto for the heritage of each of the other 15 ethnic cultures of the country. See also my article “The cultural policy of the PDG.” and “Are Fulɓe Disappearing? And Is Adlam Their Savior?” Overall, I was an active participant-observer of cultural life under the dictatorship of Sékou Touré. For instance, I was a prominent member of the National Film Censorship Commission (1971-1981). We screened, discussed, authorized or rejected movies imported for distribution around the country. Given the nature of the police-state the pro-bono function was not risk-free. Thus, in August 1978 Sékou Touré admonished the sub-commission I led was on the air waves of the Voice of the Revolution. For what reason ? We had signed our names for the approval of the film Midnight Cowboy. Unfortunately, the regime’s secrete police filed a report slamming the content of the R-rated movie. Subsequently, when I visited him with the late Zainoul A. Sanoussi, President Sékou Touré somewhat downplayed privately his public communiqué blaming us by name on the radio. It was a meager consolation for us, and particularly for our families and friends. They had been alarmed by the fact that Sékou Touré and the Bureau politique national of the PDG decided to disavow our official action so openly. They did not even watch themselves the incriminated movie, in the first place ! Although a screening session was held after the facts, in presence of Mamadi Keita, member of the Politbureau, and Senainon Behanzin, memer of the Central committee. The two officials acknowledged that despite its implicit sexual content, the film had artistic and substantive quality.… After all, it won the Motion Picture Academy Best Picture award for 1969. Another record worth mentioning, from 1975 to 1977, I was, first co-host then sole host, of a radio show called “Voyage à travers la Guinée”. Still teaching at the University, I decide to explore radio-broadcasting. My mentor was veteran journalist Odilon Théa. We featured a different region each week, presenting its history, culture, economy, touristic potential, etc. And we had fun preparing and airing the weekly (every Tuesday) program. For nearby Dubréka, I recall that we rented a cab and visited the town to collect information from residents. Later on, Marcelin Bangoura joined us. And, feeling confident in my performance, Odilon graciously bowed out and let me do the show alone. There too, an incident reminded of the peril involved in living and working under Sékou Touré. Having scheduled the town of Boffa (northwestern coast) I produced the show by going to the archives. There I dug out files about Nyara Gbèli, a mulatto female slave-trader. I aired selections of her biography and historical record. It turned out that Sékou Touré and all members of the Politbureau were tuned in. At the end the show, some were not please to hear about the slavery piece of the show. They suggested that I be summoned for explanations. Luckily, Sékou Touré agreed with those who opposed the idea, arguing that it would not be a boost to my confidence in exploring the country’s past. How did I know what happened in the higher echelon of the government? Well, Léon Maka, National Assembly president attended the meeting. His daughter, Madeleine, was a colleague and a good friend of mine at Voix de la Révolution. He told her about the discussion they had had. And she, in turn, shared with me, saying: “Tierno, careful! Last you were nearly dragged before Sékou Touré and the Bureau politique!”
Tierno S. Bah
Dianne White Oyler A cultural revolution in Africa: literacy in the Republic of Guinea since independence The International Journal of African History. Vol. 34, No. 3 (2001), pp. 585-600
At independence most African nations attempted a process of decolonization in the three spheres of European imperialism: political, economic, and cultural. While progress in the political and economic arenas is apparent decolonization of the cultural area is much harder to define because European cultural impositions had usurped the areas of language, socialization through education, and technology from simple writing to electronic media. However, the approach of the Republic of Guinea to cultural decolonization can be analyzed in light of the more formal “Cultural Revolution” launched by its independence leader Sékou Touré in 1958 as a policy of the First Republic.
Erratum. — That program’s official name and acronym were “La révolution culturelle socialiste” and RCS, respectively. And it was not launched in 1958. To the contrary, it was declared ten years later at the improvised Conseil national de la révolution held in Kankan in 1968. — T.S. Bah
Touré’s objective was to validate the indigenous cultures that had been denigrated by the Europeans while at the same time creating a Guinean national consciousness 1. In other words, Touré launched a countrywide campaign to recapture indigenous culture by formally focusing on language and education. His specific intent was to validate indigenous culture by using maternal language education to achieve better control of European science and technology. This action, he believed, would lead Guinea into creating global economic partnerships within the modem world’s economy.
An unanticipated consequence of Touré’s campaign, however, was the cultural awakening of the Maninka speakers who consider themselves to be the direct descendants of the ancient empire of Mali. Although dispersed through the countries of West Africa (including Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Burkina Faso, Benin, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Nigeria), the Maninka speakers constitute roughly 40 percent of Guinea’s population. Many of them live in the region of Haute-Guinée, which makes up about two-fifths of Guinea’s territory.
Errata. — (1) Ms. Oyler shows here the first sign of her sole reliance on verbal informants at the exclusion of available written sources. Thus it is plain wrong for her and her informers to state that Sékou Touré did not anticipate a “Maninka cultural awakening.” Actually, he was an hands-on president who exhausted himself micro-managing every aspect of social and, indeed, family and personal life. Accordingly, it’s just valid to speak of a social movement like the N’ko, that he would not have predicted, and more or less tolerated. (2) In percentage the Maninka demography comes second to the Fulɓe (Peul, Fula, Fulani) in Guinea. The former stands at approximately 35% of the population while the Fulɓe actually hold 40%. Given their respective size, the two groups weigh heavily in the political sphere. — T.S. Bah
The Maninka cultural revolution that began within Touré’s larger “Cultural Revolultion” continues today in the Second Republic of Lansana Conté, which began in 1984. The cultural revival of the Maninka language, its oral literature, and its connection to the heroic/historic past has been juxtaposed to any official policy of creating a Guinean national consciousness since 1958.
Note. —Guinea’s quest for “national consciousness” in the wake of the independence declaration stemmed from the heritage of all 16 ethnic communities, not that of the Maninka alone, especially in the first decade of the republic. Take for instance, the various musical traditions — either from sizable groups, like the Kisi of Forest Guinea with the Kebendo danse and song (see my review of Sia Tolno’s My Life album, or fom minorities, such the Koniagui (Unyëy) of Koundara with the rhythm Sampacthe. Everyone contributed and enjoyed the celebration of the birth of the new nation. Alas, the euphoria lasted no more than two years! — T.S. Bah
This article specifically addresses Guinea’s internal revolt against European cultural imperialism as evidenced in the issues of language and literacy that have dominated the political landscape in post-1958 Guinea 2.
Note. — This passage reads like a militant statement. But it lacks a specific to lend it credence. Where, when, how, and who staged the so-called revolt? How was it actually expressed? — T.S. Bah
It further addresses the concept of maternal language learning that became central to decolonization, and particularly the policy Sékou Touré developed and implemented with the support of UNESCO—the National Language Program (1968-1984) 3.
Erratum. — Beginning in the late 1960 UNESCO assisted the cultural policy of the Sékou Touré regime. However, the first illiteracy campaign was supported by the government of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Shah of Iran, in 1964-66. — T.S. Bah
More importantly, however, the article documents one result of Touré’s program that has acquired a life of its own outside government control, a grassroots literacy movement that centers on an alphabet called N’ko. The dissemination of N’ko shows the growth of a literacy movement that is currently spreading across international boundaries throughout West Africa. A salient aspect of the issue of language and literacy was the involvement of Souleymane Kanté (1922-1987), a Maninka-speaking “vernacular intellectual” who invented the N’ko alphabet in 1949. Souleymane Kanté was born in Soumankoyin-Kölönin about thirteen kilometers from Kankan. He was the son of the famous Quranic school teacher Amara Kanté. When Souleymane had finished his Quranic school education, he could read and write Arabic and translate Islamic texts. After his father’s death in 1941, Kanté left Guinea for Côte d’ Ivoire to make his fortune as an entrepreneur in a more cosmopolitan urban setting. Becoming an autodidact there, he read extensively, learned other languages, and became renowned as a scholar.
Guinea and Decolonization
Under Sékou Touré’s leadership, the Republic of Guinea ended political imperialism in 1958 when 95 percent of the voters cast a “No” vote in a referendum addressing the country’s wish to join the “French Community.” Thus began a real struggle for autonomy in the political, economic, and cultural spheres of national life. At that time the reality of political independence meant indigenous leadership; in Guinea’s case, it also meant an inexperienced leadership. Sékou Touré’s experience offers a salient example of the under-preparation of emerging African leaders.
Note. — There is no such thing leadership preparation for independence. Colonialism meant hegemony, domination, exploitation, racisme, alienation. The colonizer did not —and would never— intend to genuinely associate the colonized in power-sharing. Read Albert Memmi’s Portrait du Colonisateur. — T.S. Bah
Possessing an eighth grade, French-style colonial education, plus a bit of training supplied by French communist trade unionists, and the experience of ten years in governmental service, Touré deliberately created an eclectic form of government that drew upon the strengths of his equally eclectic education. In the Cold War period Touré chose the political path of African Socialism and the diplomatic path of nonalignment. The type of government he called “positive neutralism” allowed him to open Guinea to all manner of foreign investment without committing himself to any specific ideology 4. Inherent in the political independence of Guinea, however, was the problem of a revenue shortfall; France had withdrawn both its economic aid to Guinea and also its trade partnership. At the same time, Guinea lost its trade connections with many of France’s trading partners, especially among France’s NATO allies. Guinea’s sister colonies within French West Africa (AOF) continued to trade with her unofficially, however. As a Third World country producing raw materials to supply the First World industrial complex, Guinea produced many of the same products as other Third World nations that were constantly being encouraged to increase production. One result was a decrease in Guinea’s share of the world market, forcing the new nation to find alternative markets. With its doors closed to Western capitalist markets, Guinea became a trading partner with the Eastern bloc nations. Trade with Second World nations, however, exacerbated Guinea’s economic shortfall, as these nations were unable to purchase Guinea’s raw materials with foreign exchange, substituting instead manufactured goods. They then sold Guinea’s raw materials on the world market, thus gaining foreign exchange that improved their own economies to the detriment of Guinea’s. Although Guinea received Second World technology, she never did receive the support system that would have allowed her to maintain and expand upon that technology.
Today Guinea is one of the poorest nations in West Africa.
In the cultural sphere of Guinea’s national life, Sékou Touré opted to keep the French language; all documents would be written in French in the Roman alphabet, Guinea’s official language. It seems that Touré chose the colonial language with an eye to national unity in order to avoid the conflicts that would arise over choosing one of the twenty ethnic languages as the country’s official language. French also served Guinea in the international marketplace where buyers and sellers were not likely to learn an African language. Guinea also continued to use the French system of education. However, university training for Guineans was now sought in First and Second World countries. Students received scholarships in the United States as well as a “free” education in the Soviet Union.
Although Touré had earlier implied that Guinea would be an Islamic state after independence, he imposed religious toleration instead in a country of Muslims, Christians, and African traditional religions; this eclecticism became one method of promoting national unity.
Note. — Since the above assertion provides no reference to written sources, or to verifiable quotes, it appears pretty much groundless. — T.S. Bah
Nevertheless, in the years following Guinea’s political independence, a large segment of Guinea’s Maninka-speaking population has tried to return the cultural initiative to African hands by utilizing an indigenous alphabet created by an indigenous scholar and cultural leader named Souleymane Kanté. While Sékou Touré, a Maninka-speaker himself, had encouraged Kanté in this initiative, he preferred not to allow the use of the writing system known as N’ko as a national language/writing system. Ultimately, though, Kanté’s research and promotion of learning in the maternal languages may have directly influenced Touré, who had addressed the issues of indigenous languages/writing systems as a way to reclaim African culture by implementing a National Language Program (1968-1984).
Notes. — (1) The above paragraph is too general and vague. How does the expression “large segment” translate numerically, statistically? (2) It is hypothetical to write Souleymane Kanté “may have directly influenced” Sékou Touré’s language policy. Adverse, one can argue, the former did not inspire the latter. In the absence of any evidence from the author, I am enclined to think that Guinea’s adventurous linguistic initiatives had little to do with the efforts of Souleymane Kanté. — T.S. Bah
The N’ko Alphabet
According to informants, Souleymane Kanté created the N’ko alphabet both in response a media-based challenge 6 that Africans have no culture because they have no indigenous system of writing, and because of his growing realization that foreign writing systems could not fully express the meaning of such tonal languages as Maninka, his maternal language. Kanté responded to the allegation that “Africans have no culture” by creating an alphabet that would transcribe the twenty languages of the Mande language group as well as other tonal languages. Thus, in his role as a “vernacular intellectual,” 7 Kanté campaigned against ignorance and illiteracy by providing a writing system that would allow his countrymen to acquire knowledge without having to depend upon outside interpretation. According to informants, he expressed the idea that Africans needed to learn their own maternal languages first, because learning in a second or third language often obfuscated the cultural meaning of the text 8. The potential for indigenous literacy would enable illiterates to read and write, even though they had been excluded from the colonial education system. Kanté devoted four years (1945-1949) to research and application, trying to write the Maninka language first in Arabic script and then in the Roman alphabet. In both cases he found that foreign alphabets could not transcribe all the tones produced by the spoken Mande languages. While still living in Cote d’Ivoire, he thus embarked on an entirely new project—the creation of a writing system that would reflect the specific characteristics of Mande languages, especially their tonality. The result was the N’ko alphabet. Having developed the alphabet, he called together children and illiterates and asked them to draw a line in the dirt; he noticed that seven out of ten drew the line from right to left 9. For that reason, he chose a right-to-left orientation. In all Mande languages the pronoun n- means “I” and the verb ko represents the verb “to say.” By choosing the name N’ko, “I say” in all Mande languages, Kanté had united speakers of Mande languages with just one phrase.
Furthermore, all Mande speakers share the heroic past recounted in the tale of Sundiata, an epic of Mande history—reflecting the cultural dominance of men of valor who say “N’ko,” the clear language of Mali (Niane, 1989:87) 10. After Souleymane Kanté had perfected his alphabet, informants recall his becoming absorbed in creating reading materials in the N’ko script. Kanté’s lifelong passion then became the production of N’ko texts to highlight knowledge that should be written in the maternal language. Kanté worked assiduously after returningt o his native Guineai n 1958. He translated and transcribed Islamic texts and also works of history, sociology, linguistics, literature, philosophy, science, and technology. Then he wrote textbooks for teaching the N’ko alphabet, and, like Samuel Johnson and Noah Webster before him, he created a dictionary for the written form of the Maninka language. There are no dates for the translations of any of the above mentioned texts. Other than the fact that religious works were translated and transcribed first, informants are not aware of the order in which other texts were renderedi n N’ko. After hand-writing these texts, an arduous task in itself, Kanté would then create copies to give as gifts to teachers, thus encouraging N’ko literacy within the Mande community. Teachers then made these texts available to students, who in turn reproduced additional books by copying them. Consequently, Kanté directly touched the lives of many of those who became literate in N’ko, and he was the prime mover of a type of cultural nationalism that gave people the pride of sharing a language that could stand in words and script alongside any other.
Guinea’s Cultural Revolution
When Sékou Touré called upon all Guineans to return home to help build the new nation after Guinea achieved independence in 1958, Kanté returned from Côte d’Ivoire to a new social order 11.
From the 1940’s through the 1960’s, Guinea was in the process of reinventing itself politically and culturally at the local, regional, and national levels 12.
In the midst of this cultural upheaval, nationalist leaders professed a desire to shed colonial trappings and to tap into their heroic/historic African past. Since the ethnic groups within Guinea’s national borders had never before been joined together, a nationalist rhetoric was developed that sent mixed messages about loyalty to the past. Harking back to the grandeur of an African heritage, however, also tempted each group to focus their allegiance internally rather than to a greater Guinean nationalism. At the national level, the Partie Democratique Guineen (PDG) agitated for a Guinean “national consciousness,” 13 while local ethnic groups continued the cultural re-identification process that had begun in the mid-1940s 14.
The Maninka speakers of Haute-Guinée, for example, had established the Union Manden in 1946 as a voluntary mutual aid association organized around a linguistic, ethnic, and regional base 15. That action kindled interest in the glorious Mande past.
This mutual aid association had been founded by such Maninka speaking political activists as Sékou Touré and Framoi Bérété. The association had also served as a regional political party with the ability to launch candidates in national elections, something the Maninka speakers had been unable to do in the 1945 elections.
Despite the desire of the Union Manden to give national expression to Mande discontent, it never developed beyond its regional, cultural base 16.
The conflict between Guinean nationalism and regional, ethnic/cultural nationalism continued to manifest itself throughout the First Republic, particularly in the implementation of the National Language Program (1968-1984).
The Role of Literacy in Cultural Revolution
Souleymane Kanté introduced Sékou Touré to the idea of maternal language literacy and education in 1958 17. Although Sékou Touré had praised the Mande styled alphabet, he rejected the idea of its becoming the national alphabet of Guinea 18 because he believed it could not improve written communication among Guinea’s ethnic groups, and he knew that it would also obstruct communication with the outside world 19.
Nevertheless, Touré rewarded Kanté’s scholarly achievement by honoring him with a 200,000 CFA gift from the Guinean peoplefor indigenous excellence 20. But he still refused to support or promote the alphabet unless Kanté could prove that more than half the population of Haute-Guinée used the technology 21. Touré further requested that Kanté and his family return to his home country 22.
Answering the call, Kanté went to the area of Treicheville in Abidjan, where he was met by a military truck sent overland by Touré to collect the Kanté family 23.
The Kanté family moved to Kankan where Souleymane Kanté then became a merchant who taught N’ko on the side 24. Interestingly, however, the alphabet preceded Kanté’s arrival in Kankan; many of the initial students of N’ko had been merchants who had carried the new alphabet with them along trade routes throughout Mande-speaking West Africa 25. Informant family members reminisced that Souleymane had visited them in Guinea, and that they had visited him in Côte d’Ivoire. He had taught them the alphabet, and they in turn had taught their neighbors.
Although Sékou Touré had rejected Kanté’s Mande-styled alphabet as the national alphabet, he did eventually accept the concept of maternal language education 26.
Touré is reported to have introduced Kanté to his national education minister, Barry Diawadou, and to his minister of national defense, Fodéba Keita 27.
Touré excluded Kanté from policy making sessions, however, as he worked together with his minister of ideology and information, Senainon Béhanzin, to produce the model for a maternal language program that would accommodate Guinea’s multilingual society 28. Touré’s final proposal was then submitted to the rank and file of the PDG membership at the cell level within villages and urban districts 29.
One informant from Haute-Guinée had participated as a member of the party cell at the village level voting on the proposal for teaching in the maternal language. A teacher who had also been involved in standardization the Maninka language in the Roman alphabet, this informant explained that in 1958 Guinea was struggling to regain its political, economic, and cultural independence. The country chose to free itself culturally through a National Language Program: Congress established a National Education Commission to formulate government policy, and teachers were called upon to contribute to the effort in two ways-to standardize their specific, spoken language in the Roman alphabet and to translate into the national languages modem scientific knowledge that had been written in French. Finally, the government intended to use its publishing house, Imprimerie Patrice Lumumba, to print textbooks for the project 30.
Informants who had participated in implementing these educational reforms reminisced about the rationale behind the new policy. Literacy acquisition in French had been discarded as too complicated a procedure, as students would have had to learn both a new alphabet and a new language. The process would be simplified if people first learned a new alphabet to which they could apply the familiarm aternall anguage 31. The government established two autonomous agencies to deal with the National Language Program, the Institut de Recherche Linguistique Appliquée (IRLA) and the Service National de l’Alphabétisation (SNA) 32. Eight of the twenty different languages spoken in Guinea were selected on the basis of the numbers of people using them as a primary or secondary language:
Maninka, Susu, Pular, Kissi, Guerzé (Kpelle), Tome (Loma), Oneyan, and Wamey.
Each either was or would become a lingua franca in its region or sub-region. Although Mande languages were widely used in all four regions, the Maninka form was selected to be the dominant language to be taught only in Haute-Guinée. According to the National Language Program, an illiterate adult Mande-speaking family in Kankan would be taught the Maninka language written in the Roman alphabet; adults would be taught at work while children would be taught at school. Likewise, a Pular-speaking family living in Kankan would have the same experience; even though they were non-Mande speakers, the language of instruction would be Maninka 33. Financial constraints delayed the immediate implementation of the National Language Program 34. The regional education directors for Haute-Guinée believed that the infrastructure did not exist for a massive assault on illiteracy; despite the government’s commitment to provide free public primary education, it had failed to anticipate the additional funds necessary to generate materials written in the newly formulated and standardized national languages 35. Teachers themselves had to finance the standardization of the national languages by giving their time to the endeavor. In 1965 Touré applied for and received UNESCO funding for a maternal language education program called “Langue Nationale,” which the government implemented in 1967 36. UNESCO sent experts to assist the Guinean government in standardizing local languages in the Roman alphabet 37. Although the preparation for the National Language Program had begun in 1959, the actual campaign for adults did not begin in 1967, and in 1968 the campaign entered the schools. Both programs were associated with Sdkou Touré’s larger social program, “La Révolution Culturelle Socialiste.” 38 The reforms implemented in 1968 consisted of two coexisting educational tracks—one for schools and one for adults and school leavers. From 1968 to 1984 students in the public elementary schools were taught all subjects in the maternal language 39. During the First Cycle, in grades one through three, the language of instruction was the maternal language 40. At grade four, they were introduced to an academic course in French, which they continued each year through grade six. Academic subjects were still taught in the maternal language. In the Second Cycle, affecting the lower secondary grades seven through nine, students continued the program with an academic course in French and with the maternal language as the language of instruction. To advance to the upper secondary level, students had to pass an exam, the Brevet Elémentaire du Second Cycle Technique. During the Third Cycle, students experienced a change in the language of instruction, and the language of instruction at the lycée gradually became French 41. To be admitted to the university level—the Fourth Cycle—students had to pass the exam for the Baccalauréat Unique.
In 1973 the Ministry of Education added a thirteenth grade that bridged the third and fourth cycles, and exams were administered at the end of the thirteenth level 42. The second track consisted of adults and school leavers who were given the opportunity to acquire literacy (alphabétisation) by attending literacy programs in the maternal language before or after work either at their places of employment or at schools after the normal school day 43.
In preparation for the 1968 implementation of the National Language Program, each ethnic group was charged with standardizing the spoken language into a written form in the Roman alphabet. Educators in Kankan, the capital of Mande-speaking Haute-Guinée, looked for people who possessed a rich vocabulary and who were generally well informed who could participate in translating the diverse curricula into the maternal language.
It was then that the committee invited Souleymane Kanté to participate in the standardization process 44. They considered him an expert because while inventing the N’ko alphabet he had spent years trying to find the best way to write the Mande languages in the Roman alphabet. Kanté agreed to participate unofficially in the project.
Souleymane Kanté’s Indigenous Approach to Literacy
Although Souleymane Kanté assisted the government with the standardization of his maternal language, Maninka, he did not abandon his own literacy program. Kanté disapproved of Touré’s National Language Program because it depended upon a foreign alphabet and on foreign constructions. In fact, he held that if there were to be a cultural revolution that drew upon the African past, then African cultural forms should be its foundation. Kanté’s goal was to control Mande and modern knowledge through the use of a Mande language and literacy program. He thus offered an indigenous alternative to the official National Language Program. The two literacy initiatives, he believed, were not mutually exclusive. Touré’s state-funded literacy campaign dominated the formal education scene, drawing upon the existing infrastructure, its curricula and its personnel. Kanté is remembered as having taught N’ko in the marketplace. He had taught the members of his own extended family and had recommended that others do the same 45. The “each one teach one” policy was actually a recommendation for each person to teach at least seven others. Informants recalled that Kanté attracted many followers by demonstrating N’ko at social functions, such as funerals, where he opened his Qur’an written in N’ko and read the Word of God 46. Kanté suggested that everyone should learn N’ko and that those who refused would later regret their error. Kanté’s literacy movement slowly gained support as it operated on the fringes in an informal educational environment that paralleled Touré’s state system. Kanté’s movement possessed no infrastructure, enjoyed no financial assistance, had no texts except the ones students copied for themselves. The engine that powered the movement was a person’s desire to repossess Mande culture by controlling knowledge through Mande language and literacy. Teachers were the key to this grassroots movement. Some teachers were drawn from the existing state-funded pool of personnel. Others were businessmen and workers who taught N’ko at their businesses or in their homes. Most in the N’ko teaching force contributed their time without remuneration. In some cases the students’ families gave gifts to their teachers at the end of the service in order to help support the teacher or the school. The process of learning N’ko took about four months. Each N’ko teacher could teach three groups per year. In the beginning, students were mostly adults, who later saw to it that their children were also educated in N’ko. Armed with a blackboard, a tripod, and a piece of chalk, the N’ko teachers employed a methodology similar to that of Quranic school—memorization, imitation, and utilization. Students would congregate at the compound of a teacher where they would copy the alphabet on slate or paper and then would use oral recitation as a tool for memorization and reinforcement. The teacher conducted the class, but students, regardless of age, had the responsibility for leading the recitations. Students who were quick and adept were recruited as assistants and eventually became teachers themselves. Students copied the texts that Kanté had translated and transcribed to produce personal or family copies. Those who became N’ko literate were well equipped to read the literature Kanté had generated, were able to communicate with others literate in N’ko, and could keep records and accounts for their businesses. Some students undertook the task of recording the oral histories of older members of their families to preserve in writing first-hand knowledge 47.
The Contest: Sékou Touré vs. Souleymane Kanté
An informal competition over the recasting of Mande culture developed as Sékou Touré and Souleymane Kanté seemed to wrestle with each other for the number of Mande speakers in Haute-Guinée who acquired literacy in the maternal language.
Maternal language literacy was the goal, but the choice of alphabet seemed to become a personal issue. Touré appeared to have the advantage because his program was heir to the already existing state program. His selection of the Roman alphabet was prudent because the alphabet was already used throughout much of the world, and local typesetting existed and was in place. While a few maternal language textbooks were published, the translation and publication of other works in the maternal languages never materialized 48. Kanté worked at a disadvantage. From the standpoint of infrastructure and funding, he lacked resources, and N’ko required an innovation in typesetting that was not locally available. Yet he continued to produce handwritten translated texts in the N’ko alphabet. These translations systematically spread throughoutt he Mande-speaking community as students hand copied them so as to have their personal copies for reading and teaching.
The two Mande-speaking competitors had developed opposing teaching methodologies. Sékou Touré imposed the Roman alphabet upon children and adults through the state-supported literacy program. The concept of a National Language Program had been supported by the PDG rank and file. But some educators observed that the program had a negative effect on learning French as an international language of diplomacy and economics 49. Because the educational system was universal only at the elementary level, students who failed the exams at the end of the Second Cycle never had the opportunity to continue French language instruction. In addition, adults who were acquiring literacy through the program never had the opportunity to learn French because they were limited to the maternal language. The goal was national literacy, and children and adults were becoming literate in the maternal language, limiting them to regional participation. By using the educational process in this manner, the government had effectively restricted the numbers of participants in the national arena, and, by so doing, restricted access to full knowledge of the French language itself. On the other hand, Souleymane Kanté had attracted students by focusing upon Mande culture. Adults and children learned the alphabet voluntarily because it was culturally important to them. Having learned the alphabet, students used it for correspondence and business, and they amassed handwritten translations of religious, historical, and modem scientific texts. The significance of N’ko literacy led to a personal understanding of a wide variety of knowledge. Learning N’ko became a form of self-improvement because it was not promoted as the acquisition of knowledge for advancement in the political or economic structure of the nation. Touré had clung to a limited vision—that of the European—conceived nation-state that while striving for a Guinean national consciousness could not leave the designated borders of the Guinean nation. Kanté’s arena had been regional; he created a Mande consciousness that eventually drew together Guinea’s resident Mande speakers of Haute-Guinée and Guinée Forestière, and, more importantly, ultimately connected all the Mande speakers in West Africa. Although Touré’s motives cannot be wholly known 50, in formants have characterized his relationship to Kanté based on conversations with either or both men and through the events the informants themselves witnessed.
It appears that in the 1960s Touré had hoped to isolate Kanté from his work by coopting him into the National Language Program. Kanté would not abandon his own work, however, and continued teaching the N’ko alphabet and translating texts into N’ko. Informants relate that Kanté wrote out texts by hand and used a Renault duplication machine capable of producing books of ten to twenty pages. In 1971 when the machine broke down, he journeyed to Conakry to ask the government for financial assistance in establishing a larger-scale print shop capable of duplicating works such as the N’ko version of the Qur’an 51.
In Conakry, Al-Hajj Kabiné Diané helped Kanté as much as he could by printing small runs at this Arabic printing press 52. Touré did nominate Kanté to the Conseil Islamique National (charged with defending Islam and its principles in Guinea) 53, but Kanté declined the appointment, saying that the committee meetings would interfere with the time he needed to translate texts into N’ko 54. Making his home in Conakry in the early 1970s, Kanté continued to write documents by hand; then he took them to Al-Hajj Kabiné Diané for printing 55. Kanté sold the printed manuscripts for a small sum in order to promote further literacy in N’ko in all segments of the community 56.
His family and friends reported that the relationship between the two men continued to deteriorate until Sékou Touré’s death in 1984. Thus, from the late 1970s through mid-1980’s, Kanté was forced to leave Guinea on several occasions and to reside in neighboring countries under the threat of being arrested or killed by Touré’s government 57.
During this self-imposed exile, Souleymane Kanté continued to translate works into N’ko and to compile a text of Mande healing arts 58.
Sékou Touré’s National Language Program from 1968 to 1984 had produced people who were literate in their spoken maternal language.
Under the leadership of Lansana Conté, the Second Republic implemented a new language program: French became the single national language and the language of literacy. Although maternal language radio programs occurred during the Touré regime, the new government has systematically supported learning in the maternal languages by producing radio and television programs of cultural and news content spoken in only three of Guinea’s maternal languages—Susu, Maninka, and Pular.
After his return home to Guinea in 1985, Souleymane Kanté lived in Conakry teaching his alphabet until his death from diabetes in 1987 59.
Statistics on the number of adults and children who know how to read and write N’ko have not been established.
Under Kanté’s direction, his disciples established the Association pour l’Impulsion et la Coordination des Recherches sur l’Alphabet N’ko (ICRA-N’KO) in 1986. ICRA-N’KO was officially sanctioned by the government in 1991 as a non-governmental organization (NGO) 60. Only since then has the group actively begun to compile statistics based on the current number of students enrolled in N’ko classes. Each teacher turns in a list of students to the local ICRAN’KO association, which records the numbers and sends them on to the Service National d’Alphabétisation to be included in the year’s literacy statistics.
By looking at the numerical fragments, it can be seen that the number of students in N’ko classes had steadily increased from 1989 to 1994; however, it is not possible to say whether or not this was the result of an increase in the number of students or the result of better record-keeping.
A literacy survey of Kankan I conducted in 1994 presents the first literacy statistics for the city 61. Canvassers interviewed each household about the languages spoken and about the alphabets used to transcribe those languages. One would expect a competitive percentage of those who were able to read and write the Maninka language in the Roman alphabet after sixteen years of Touré’s National Language Program.
The results of the survey are enlightening because they show that only 3.1 percent of the 128,000—plus indigenous inhabitants (men, women, and children above the age of five) knew how to read and write in French, while 8.8 percent knew how to read and write N’ko 62.
Other figures show that among the people of Kankan, 8.5 percent could read Arabic and 14.1 percent could read and write French. The “langue nationale” appears to have been discarded, while the N’ko alphabet appears to be blossoming.
Kanté’s N’ko seems to have become more widely accepted in Kankan. Thus the ultimate advantage seems to lie with Kanté’s approach rather than Touré’s.
Since independence the Maninka speakers of Guinea have struggled against what they perceived to be Western cultural imperialism in the area of language and literacy. As a conflict within the nation-state, it reflects the ongoing struggle for autonomy. Being literate in N’ko has become an important part of the current Mande cultural revival because the possession of N’ko signifies the reclaiming of the area’s cultural integrity.
The N’ko alphabet has offered Maninka speakers a renewed capacity to make culturally significant choices, and they seem to have chosen N’ko as an indigenous alternative to the education of language/literacy promoted by the Western-influenced Mande speakers who have controlled government and religion since Touré’s time.
Persons seeking to learn N’ko have steadily created enthusiasm and support for learning the alphabet, which has spread from Mande-speaking Kankan both to other Mande speakers throughout Guinea and also to Mande speakers residing in neighboring states.
* This article is based on the research in Kankan, Republic of Guinea in 1991, 1992-1993, and 1994, with the assistance of a Fulbright Dissertation Research Scholarship for 1992-1993 and a West African Research Association Fellowship for the summer of 1994.
Notes 1. In the same year in the British colony of Nigeria, Chinua Achebe also validated indigenous culture by writing his classic novel, Things Fall Apart (1958). 2. It is difficult to divorce the broader issues of Guinea’s “Cultural Revolution” from ethnic ones, however, particularly the view that during the Touré and Conté periods (1958-1984 and 1984 to the present, respectively), Maninka speakers may have been progressively disfranchised from the nation’s political process. Touré did not empower all Maninka speakers but gave preference to the ones from his own area of Faranah. Conté is a Susu speaker who has systematically alienated the Maninka speakers since taking power in 1984. However, his support of the Maninka based grassroots literacy movement might be an attempt to change this. 3. Sékou Touré’s archival documents, including personal papers and correspondence, were either destroyed or hidden after his death. Consequently, there are no currently existing archives of the First Republic and the papers that are hidden are inaccessible. With regard to the personal relationship between Sékou Touré and Souleymane Kanté, interviews provide some insights. 4. André Lewin, La Guinée: [Que Sais-je?] (Paris, 1984), 67. 5. By 1990 there were approximately 16 million speakers of the 20 languages classified as Mande, radiating out from the Mande heartland across the borders of ten West African countries. The Maninka speakers of Guinea reside in the region of Upper Guinea adjacent to the Mande heartland, which lies just across Guinea’s border with Mali. 6. Informants explained that Kanté accepted a 1944 challenge posed by the Lebanese journalist Kamal Marwa in an Arabic-language publication, Nahnu fi Afrikiya [We Are in Africa]. Marwa argued that Africans were inferior because they possessed no indigenous written form of communication. His statement that “African voices [languages] are like those of the birds, impossible to transcribe” reflected the prevailing views of many colonial Europeans. Although the journalist acknowledged that the Vai had created a syllabary, he discounted its cultural relevancy because he deemed it incomplete. Personal Interviews 08 in Karifamoriah, 46 in Kankan, and 70 in Conakry, 1993. To protect the identity of the informant or informants, interview citations include only the interview number, date, and location. The informants are equally divided between N’ko practitioners and those outside the N’ko community, some of whom have never heard of the alphabet. All interviews took place with the author and research assistant in in Guinea unless otherwise indicated. Interviews were conducted randomly as informants were available, or as travel arrangements could be made I have in my possession the audiotapes in Maninka and the written translations in French. 7. See Steven Feierman’s stimulating use of the term in Peasant Intellectuals: Anthropology and History in Tanzania (Madison, 1990). 8. Group Interview 18, 5 April 1993, Balandou, Guinea. Kanté emphasizes the integration of local knowledge with foreign knowledge by preserving both in the maternal language in a script that he himself creates. For that reason, one should characterize him as a vernacular intellectual. 9. Interviews 62 (14 July 1993) and 70 (18 July 1993), in Conakry, and Interview 09, 11 March 1993, Kankan. Souleymane Kanté’s experiments, reinforced by his acquisition of Arabic literacy as an Islamic scholar, were responsible for the selection of this right to left orientation. It might also have been a political statement rejecting African deculturation by Europeans. 10. Interview 70, 8 July 1993, Conakry. It is evident that this informant associates Kanté with his own ethnic pride in the heroic/historic Mande past as descendants of the ancient kingdom of Mali. 11. Odile Goerg, “La Guinée,” in Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch with Odile Goerg, L’Afrique Occidentale au temps des Français Colonisateurs et Colonisé (c. 1860-1960) (Paris, 1992), 365. 12. R.W. Johnson, “Guinea,” in John Dunn, ed., West Africa States, Failure and Promise A Study in Comparative Politics (Cambridge, 1978), 38. 13. Defined by Victor Du Bois as “a feeling among the citizens of the young republic that their destiny is somehow linked to that of other peoples with whom in the past they have never shared a sense of kinship or identity.” Du Bois, “Guinea,” in James S. Coleman and Carl. Rosberg, Jr.,e ds., Political Parties and National Integration in Tropical Africa (Berkeley, 1964), 199. 14. Ibid., 186. 15. Ruth Schachter Morgenthau, Political Parties in French-speaking West Africa (Oxford, 1964), 224. 16. Jean Suret-Canale, La République de Guinée (Paris, 1970), 144. 17. In Interview 60, 9 July 1993, in Conakry, the informant said that as a Mande speaker himself, Sékou Touré sincerely admired Kanté’s invention but that he was a political man wanting to promote national unity. In Interview 80, 20 July 1994, in Conakry, a personal friend of Touré said that the latter wanted to support N’ko but that the other members of the Political Bureau, and his cabinet, did not. 18. Choosing Mande as the national language or even institutionalizing the Mande-styled alphabet for orthography would have caused dissension between Mande speakers and the other ethnic groups in Guinea. Furthermore, while Mande speakers could write the Mande language in N’ko, Susu speakers could write the Susu language in N’ko, and Pular speakers could write the Pular language in N’ko, they would not be able to read each other’s texts; although the script was the same, the languages would not be mutually intelligible. The former regional director of education in Kankan commented that the rejection of Kanté’s alphabet was divisive among the leaders of Touré’s government. Interview 64, 64, 15 July 1993, in Conakry. 19. Interview 09, 11 March 1993, in Kankan; Interview 60, 9 July 1993, in Conakry; Interview 68, 7 July 1993, in Conakry; Interview 80, 20 July 1994, in Conakry; Interview 59, 28 June 1993, in Kankan; and Group Interview 84, 15 August 1994, in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. 20. In Group Interview 43, 18 May 1993, in Kankan, one informant stated that Sékou Touré had promised Souleymane Kanté that he would build a school for N’ko. 21. Interview 51, 22 June 1993, in Djankana; Interview 59, 28, June 1993, in Kankan. 22. There is some confusion about the manner in which this occurred. Some informants have said that Sékou Touré sought out Souleymane Kantd in Abidjan after hearing about the alphabet through the grapevine. Interview 51, 22 June 1993, in Djankana. Others insisted that Souleymane Kanté went on his own to Conakry to present the alphabet to Touré. Interview 59, 28 June 1993, in Kankan. One informant claimed to have taught Sékou Touré N’ko, after which Touré told the informant to invite Kanté to visit him in Conakry. Interview 80, 20 July 1994, in Conakry. Regardless of who initiated the interview, informants concur on the rest of the story. In Interview 81, 9 August 1994, in Conakry, the informant reasserted the claim that the informant in Interview 80 had in fact taught N’ko to Sékou Touré, but that Sékou abandoned his studies when the political arena heated up. In Group Interview 84, 15 August 1994, in Abidjan, we visited the house where the Kanté family shared a room and spoke with neighbors who witnessed the military truck moving the family back to Guinea. 23. Interview 51, 22 June 1993, in Djankana. 24. According to the informants in Group Interview 08, 8 March 1993, in Karifamoriah, at the time only Maninka-speaking long-distance traders were merchants in Abidjan. When the exploitation of the Sefadou diamond mines in Sierra Leone began, many of these merchants carried the ability to write and teach N’ko with them into the new marketplace. 25. Prior to independence, many Guineans were dispersed throughout West Africa. Some were employed by the French as bureaucrats, teachers, or as railroad transportation workers. Others, such as a large number of Maninka speakers, were dispersed along West African trade routes. For example one informant’s father had been the railroad station-master at Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, in 1944. Interview 07, 6 March 1993, Kankan; Niane, Sundiata, 93. 26. Sékou Touré, “Débat culturel: Le Chef de l’Etat sur les langues africaines,” Horoya 2889, 25-31 Octobre 1981, 13-16. 27. Interview 68, 17 July 1993, in Conakry. 28. Interview 64, 15 July 1993, in Conakry. 29. Johnson, “Guinea,” 55. In Touré’s attempt to reconnect to the African past, he organized the party structure to imitate the organization of village councils. The system appeared to consult the common man on every major government decision. Ideally, the idea originated at the cell level and gained acceptance as it moved to the high-ranking leaders of the Bureau Politique National (BPN). In this case the idea originated at the top and was presented for approval to the Comités d’Unité de l’Education. Du Bois describes the organization of the PDG in his political commentary, “Guinea,” 200-205. UNESCO, The Experimental World Literacy Programme: A Critical Assessment (Paris, 1976), 26-30. 30. Interview 34, 10 May 1993, in Kankan, and Interview 55, 24 June 1993, in Kankan. 31. Interview 64, 15 July 1993, in Conakry; Interview 60, 9 July 1993, in Conakry; and Interview 55, 24, June 1993, in Kankan. 32. Interview 66, 16 July 1993, in Conakry. The informant was a Directeur Régional de l’Education in Kankan. 33. Mohamed Lamine Sano, “Aperçu Historique sur l’Utilisation des Langues Nationales en République de Guinée,” unpublished paper (1992), 3-4. 34. Interview 64, 15 July 1993, in Conakry. 35. UNESCO, World Literacy Programme, 42. 36. Interview 64, 15, July 1993, in Conakry. 37. UNESCO considered its program separate from the government’s national campaign. Interestingly enough, the UNESCO funds were not used for a pilot project in Haute-Guinée. The program targeted 3,500 illiterate and newly literate industrial workers in Conakry and 75,000 illiterate farmers living in lower Guinea (the Susu language), middle Guinea (the Pular language), and the forest region (the Kissi, Guerzé, and Toma languages). UNESCO, World Literacy Programme, 42-43. 38. Interview 64, 15 July 1993, in Conakry; Group Interview 46, 19 June 1993, in Kankan; and Interview 55, 24 June 1993, in Kankan. See Ministère du Domaine de l’Education et de la Culture, La Reforme de l’Enseignement en Republique de Guinée Novembre 1958-Mai 1977 (Conakry, 1977), 6-8. 39. Kamori Traoré, “Guinée,” in Alfâ Ibrâhîm Sow, ed., Langues et Politiques de Langues en Afrique Noire: l’Experience de l’UNESCO (Paris, 1976), 265. 40. Interview 60, 9 July 1993, in Conakry. 41. Ministry of Education and Culture, Cultural Policy in the Revolutionary People’s Republic of Guinea (Paris, 1979), 36. 42. Ibid., 9-10. 43. Interviews 34 and 55, 10 May 1993 and 24 June 1993, respectively in Kankan were with one informant. 44. Interviews 34 (10 May 1993) and 55 (24 June 1993), in Kankan. 45. Souleymane Kante’s recommendations were that each person should teach seven other people. Group Interview, 08, 8 March 1993, in Karifamoriah. In Interview 05, 3 March 1993, in Kankan, the informant said that the instructions were to teach the family, so he taught all of his children. 46. Interview 60, 9 July 1993, in Conakry. 47. Those who were literate in N’ko were spoken of as preserving for posterity the oral histories of elders. Interview 05, 3 March 1993, in Kankan. 48. Secretariat d’Etat à l’Idéologie-Service National d’Alphabétisation, Sori ni Mariama (Teheran, n.d.) and Académie des Langues Conakry, Maninkakan Sariya, Grammaire Maninka 2e et 3e cycle (Conakry, 1980) are examples of texts produced for the literacy program. 49. Interview 66, 16 July 1993, in Conakry. 50. According to this informant, the government could not fight the N’ko alphabet directly. It was necessary to formulate a political strategy to eliminate N’ko, either to isolate the creator so that he would abandon it or to exile him so that the population would forget about it. Interview 59, 28 June 1993, in Kankan. In Interview 68, 17 July 1993, in Conakry, the informant stated that the government used Kanté in the National Language Program because he was the only one who could translate all of the necessary terminologies. 51. A local merchant, Sékou Diané, is remembered as having given Souleymane Kanté money to buy this machine in Abidjan. Interview 29, 3 May 1993, and Interview 49, 20 June 1993, in Kankan; Interview 68, 17 July 1993, in Conakry. 52. Interview 82, 10 August 1994, in Conakry. El Hadj Kabiné Diané was a prominent businessman from Kankan who also owned a business in Conakry and was a part of the National Islamic Council. 53. In Interview 09, 11 March1 993, in Kankan, the informant established the date as 1973. 54. Interview 62, 14 July1 993, in Conakry. 55. Ibid.; and Interview 32, 8 May 1993, in Kankan. 56. Interview 32, 8 May 1993, in Kankan. 57. Interview 80, 20 July 1994, in Conakry, the informants described Touré as being troubled by leadership problems he was experiencing with Guinea’s intellectuals. In Interview 59, 28 June 1993, in Kankan, the informant told a story he heard from Souleymane Kanté: The government had supplied Kanté with transportation to Romania for treatment of his diabetes in 1974. Assisting the Guinean government, th e Romanian government institutionalized Kanté in a psychiatric facility, where an attempt was made on his life by lethal injection. Kanté refused the treatment and escaped death. Kanté convinced the doctors to release him, since, in the end, his condition itself was a death sentence. Later in Conakry he met the person who had been the Guinean ambassador to Romania at the time of his incarceration, wh o thought that Kanté was deceased. Interview 31, 8 May 1993, in Kankan, Interview 62, 14 July 1993, in Conakry and Group Interview 46, 19 June 1993, in Kankan. 58. Interview 31, 8 May 1993, in Kankan, Interview 51, 22 June 1993, in Djankana; Interview 62, 14 July 1993, in Conakry; Interview 59, 28 June 1993, in Kankan; Group Interview 30, 4 May 1993, in Bamako. Group Interview 84, 15 August 1994, in Abidjan, the informants recalled that Kanté told them that he had returned to Côte d’Ivoire in political exile and said that Touré was jealous of his invention. Theye estimated that he spent eight years with them in Côte d’Ivoire, two years in Bouake and six in Abidjan, interspersed with trips to Bamako. 59. Interview 62, 14, July 1993, in Conakry. 60. Interview 68, 17 July 1993, in Conakry, and Interview 69, July 18, 1993, in Conakry. 61. Literacy Survey of Kankan, 4 August 1994. There are no complete literacy statistics at any level. The numbers represented in the survey offer a beginning point at which literacy statistics can be assessed and can be later measured in percentages. I conducted another Literacy Survey of Kankan in July 2000. When I have finished entering the data, I will be able to determine growth in the numbers who are literate in N’ko over the last six years. 62. The literacy survey showed that 14.1 percent of the population knew how to read and write French, 8.5 percent of the population knew how to read and write Arabic, 8.8 percent of the population knew how to read and write [the Maninka language] in N’ko, and 3.1 percent of the population knew how to read and write [Maninka] in the Roman alphabet [Langue Nationale].